THE JUDICIARY CAN NOT ENACT LAW ITSELF . IT CAN JUST INTERPRET WHAT THE PARLIAMENT ENACTS AS LAWS.
A FB FRIEND :
As a brahmin, I demand supreme court to pass “Brahmin atrocities act (BAA)” in which any person who targets/ makes fun of brahmins community/ shows negativity towards brahmins in movies or social media must be punished severely just like SC ST Atrocities act. If you think this is needed, PLEASE SHARE and show the unity in brahmins and hindus and let the supreme court hears our voice.
ME : LET ME JUST SUGGEST AN IMPORTANT POINT . THE RIGHT DOOR TO KNOCK AT IS NOT THAT OF THE JUDGE BUT THE MPS WHO PROPOSE LAWS IN PARLIAMENT … please note that any law should be enacted by only parliament and the law is integrated in our law code book then it is learnt by students of law and then the judge who had learnt enough and retains every article of every law voted and approved by the parliament uses this BOOK to see how those laws should be applied to people and how the non adherence of those laws by anybody should be dealt with. So, if the mind who conceives the “articles of laws”‘ is the PARLIAMENT , the judge is THE EXECUTIVE HAND WHO JUST HAS THE RIGHT TO TRANSLATE THE SPIRIT OF THAT LAW IN DAILY LIFE OF THE PEOPLE…THE JUDGE IS just the INTERPRETER OF THE CODE OF LAW ….SO ASK THE PARLIAMENT AND NOT THE JUDGE TO ENACT THIS LAW. PLEASE