WHEN YOU WANT TO EQUATE PREDATOR AND HIS PREY , AND WHEN YOU WANT TO EQUATE monotheistic dogamtic mindset jihadis WITH HINDUS , THAT IS ONE AND THE SAME. WHEN THEY ARE IN MINORITY, THEY WILL NOT RAISE THEIR VOICE BUT CONTINUE DEMANDING SPECIAL STATUS BUT THE DAY THEY ARE IN MAJORITY YOU ARE FINISHED …so beware
Mr Hador Singh said: ‘When I was 16 , I lived in a village in Rawalpindi , my father· was head· of the village . On the evening of the 8 th of March , we began to feel· the heat of the houses catching fire· .
‘We all gathered together and my father· had a large· sword· . The Muslims said “give us a young· and beautiful girl· and we will let· you get· on with your lives” .
‘My father· rejected their demands , he said “we won’t give· you our girls to save· ourselves . Rather than let· our girls come· to this shame· , we will kill· them ourselves and hope they forgive· us” . ‘
The octogenarian then revealed how he watched girls , including his own sister , line· up to have· their heads cut· off by his father’s sword· rather than be· violated by Muslim men· .
‘No one cried , then it went on turn· by turn· , my father· pushed me away , no boys or young· children were killed , only the girls were killed , ‘ he said .
He added that women then began throwing themselves and their daughters into a village well.
‘Eighty-four or 86 jumped in the well , in 15 minutes , the well became full· , ‘ he said .
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3255063/To-hear-brutal-changed-Strictly-star-Anita-Rani-left-stunned-discovering-grandfather-s-wife-killed-India-raped-savage-violence-Partition.html#ixzz4ofi8vX5V
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
In this disturbing video about the 1947 Partition , a Sikh survivor narrates how his father· had to kill· his own daughter with a kirpan to save· her from being raped by the Muslims . The first· strike· wasn’t clean . The dying girl·lifted her braid· up and lowered her head· once again . The father· struck harder this time· . The 18 or 19 year old daughter’s head· was severed from the body· . Thank you Murali Reddy for sharing this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WQtUYv1_-s .
I have· been asked this questions numerous times before: “Yes , the Muslims were completely wrong· in murdering and raping the Hindus . However , did two· wrongs make· it right· when the Hindus and Sikhs retaliated in kind· ? ”
My answer· has always been consistent from early teenage:
Hinduism and Sikhism honor· women and do· not advocate· that in war one rape the enemy’s womenfolk . Christianity and Islam , on the other hand· , advocate· killing the enemy menfolk and raping their women . M . K . Gandhi , who completely lacked a moral compass· , advocated that the Hindus and Sikhs should go· down without as much as resisting . They should get· killed and raped by the Muslims and by doing so , the pervert· argued , “(the Hindus and Sikhs) shall be· ushering in a new India . ” Gandhi’s nauseating and immoral· advocacy didn’t stop· there . He added: “If Hindus and Sikhs sacrifice· their lives at hands· of Muslims without rancor· or retaliation· they will become· saviors not only of their own religions but also of Islam and the whole· world . ”
Most people· who take· the stance· that the Hindus and Sikhs shouldn’t have· retaliated in kind· are those brainwashed by this revolting· Gandhian thinking . It also so happens that such Gandhian admirers never had to face·the brutalities of the Partition themselves . They never had to witness· the gang· rape of their own wives . They never had to hack· a beloved daughter to death· to save· her from gang-rape .
What if you happened to be· the father· who had to face· the impossible predicament· which the Sikh father· in this video did ? Let us evaluate· two·options in front· of you .
In the first· option· , you abide· by Gandhi’s advice and simply look· on while the Muslim mob· gang-rapes your daughter . Would you be· able to see· her in the eye when you meet· again in the hereafter world ? What if she asked , “Father , why did you not try· to save· me ? ” What would be· your answer· ? You would’be betrayed her trust· in you .
In the second· option· , you do· what the Sikh father· in the video did . You could tell· your daughter , when you meet· in the hereafter world , “Beta , I was outnumbered . I had to kill· you with the very hands· which hugged you for 18 years· . If I hadn’t , those Muslims would’ve gang-raped you and sold you into sex· slavery· . ” You would cry· together but she would understand·that you didn’t betray· her trust· in you .
Now , let· us not deny· the facts . Muslims were motivated by Islam to rape and murder· the Hindus . They didn’t rape other Muslims . They were clearly guided by “us-versus-them” mentality· . What if the Hindus and Sikhs had retaliated in kind· wherever they could ? Muslims would’ve got the message·that there is a consequence· to their actions . They would’ve understood that for every Hindu or Sikh they murder· , a dozen Muslims would be· killed in retaliation· . For every Hindu or Sikh they rape , a dozen Muslims would be·raped . At least in some cases , this would’ve alerted the Muslim leadership·to the outcome· that awaited the Muslim community· . They would’ve made attempts to restrain· the Muslims from going on a murder· and rape spree . After all , those attacks on Hindus and Sikhs were systematically organized from the mosques . They could’ve been deterred from the very same mosques .
Therefore , the caveat of retaliation· in kind· increases the probability of deterrence of crime· in the first· place· . Hence it is the morally justifiableoption· . On the other hand· , not retaliating in kind· emboldens Muslims and induces more Muslims to join· the spree . Therefore , it contributes to an increased occurrence· of crime· and hence is morally indefensible·